(1) If an application is made under section 73, the Operator must review the original determination or cause the original determination to be reviewed by an independent decision - maker:
(a) to whom the Operator's power under this section is delegated; and
(b) who was not involved in the making of the determination.
(2) The person (the reviewer ) reviewing the original determination must:
(a) reconsider the determination; and
(b) make a determination (the review determination ) doing one of the following:
(i) affirming the original determination;
(ii) varying the original determination;
(iii) setting the original determination aside and substituting a new determination.
(3) When reviewing the original determination, the reviewer may have regard to the following:
(a) the information and documents that were available to the person who made the original determination;
(b) any information and documents that accompany the application for review;
(c) further information requested under section 75A or 75B.
(a) either:
(i) the reduction is the result of considering information mentioned in paragraph (3)(b) or (c); or
(ii) the Operator has reasonable grounds to believe that information given, a document produced, or a statement made to an officer of the scheme in relation to the application for redress, or the application for review, is false or misleading in a material particular; and
(b) the reduction is appropriate, having regard to the principles set out in section 10.
Note: A person may be liable to a civil penalty or commit an offence if the person gives information, produces a document or makes a statement to an officer of the scheme and the person knows, or is reckless as to whether, the information, document or statement is false or misleading in a material particular (see section 28 of this Act and sections 136.1, 137.1 and 137.2 of the Criminal Code ).